Quick refresher
- Every cash flow has three characteristics: an amount in a particular currency, a sign (inflow “+”, outflow “−”) and the moment when the money is actually paid, not the moment of signing the contract or of delivery.
- The main items are revenue (+), capital expenditure (spending on things that last, such as wells and plants), operating expenditure (the costs of running them) and payments to the state (−). The net cash flow of a period is their sum with signs.
- Depreciation (the accounting write-off of an asset's cost over several years) is not a payment. It is not part of the cash flow and affects it only through income tax.
- Only incremental flows are included in the appraisal: the difference between the future “with the project” and “without the project”. Costs already spent (sunk costs) are not counted; income that the project gives up is counted.
- A typical production project has several years of negative flow for drilling and development, then a positive flow at the production plateau (the period of steady, maximum production), then a decline as production falls, and an outflow for abandonment (closing the wells and facilities) at the end.
- A cash flow model sets the period (usually a calendar year), the moment to which the flow of a period is assigned (usually mid-year), the time origin, and the kind of money: nominal (the money of each year) or constant prices (the prices of one base year).
net cash flow of a period: revenue minus capital expenditure, operating expenditure and taxes
its minimum is the project's maximum cash outlay
profit after tax differs from NCF by the difference between capital expenditure and depreciation (a simple model with no payment deferrals; abandonment is an expense of the year it is paid)
- Deducting depreciation from the cash flow is double counting: the capital expenditure has already been deducted in the year it was paid.
- Including money that has already been spent in the appraisal or, conversely, forgetting the income that the project takes away from the company's other assets.
- Mixing up multiplication and division when converting currencies and tonnes into barrels.
- Mixing money of the day and constant prices in one model.
- Forgetting abandonment costs at the end of the project's life.
After this lesson you can
- list the items of the cash flow of an oil and gas project and the sign of each
- explain how cash flow differs from accounting profit and why projects are appraised on cash flow
- distinguish capital expenditure from operating expenditure and explain how this division affects taxes
- decide which payments belong to the project and which do not: the incremental principle (count only what the project changes), sunk costs (money already spent) and opportunity costs (income given up)
- build a simple annual cash flow table and describe the typical shape of the cumulative flow (the running total of the yearly flows)
What cash flow is
The value of a project is decided not by how much has already been put into it, but by what it will bring in the future. We describe the future of a project as a series of sums of money spread over time. First come the payments for wells and equipment. Then come the receipts from the sale of oil, and the running expenses. At the end come the abandonment costs. This series is called the project's cash flow.
Every element of the flow has three characteristics.
- The sign shows the direction. An inflow is money coming in, with the sign “+”; an outflow is money going out, with the sign “−”. The same operation has a different sign for different parties: payment for drilling is an outflow for the subsoil user and an inflow for the drilling company.
- The moment is the date of actual payment, not of signing the contract or of delivery. If a drilling rig was ordered in October, received in February and paid for in March, then in the cash flow it is an outflow of March.
- The currency. Oil is usually sold for US dollars. Imported equipment is paid for in the supplier's currency. Wages, local services and taxes are paid in tenge (KZT). The company keeps its accounts in its base currency. In the model all amounts are converted into one currency at an assumed exchange rate, and this rate is itself an assumption of the model.
Items of the cash flow
A real project has thousands of payments, from business-trip expenses to the construction of an oil treatment plant (a plant that cleans the oil and prepares it for sale). For analysis we group them into a few items and add them up within each item.
- Item
- Revenue
- Sign
- +
- What it includes
- sales of oil, gas and condensate; fees for services, for example for transporting someone else's oil through one's own pipeline
- When it arises
- from the start of production; proportional to the volume sold and the price
- Item
- Capital expenditure (CAPEX)
- Sign
- −
- What it includes
- additional exploration, well drilling, field development, pipelines, oil and gas treatment plants
- When it arises
- mostly before production starts; some later: new wells, expansion of facilities
- Item
- Operating expenditure (OPEX)
- Sign
- −
- What it includes
- staff, electricity and fuel, chemicals, routine maintenance, transport of the product
- When it arises
- all the time the facilities operate; part of it grows with production
- Item
- Taxes and payments to the state
- Sign
- −
- What it includes
- bonuses (one-off payments to the state), royalty or mineral extraction tax (payments based on the volume or value produced), income tax, other payments under the contract
- When it arises
- bonuses at the signing of the contract or after a discovery; production-based payments when production starts; income tax when profit appears, often with a delay
- Item
- Abandonment
- Sign
- −
- What it includes
- plugging and abandoning wells (sealing them for good), dismantling equipment, land reclamation (restoring the land)
- When it arises
- at the end of the field's life
| Item | Sign | What it includes | When it arises |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | + | sales of oil, gas and condensate; fees for services, for example for transporting someone else's oil through one's own pipeline | from the start of production; proportional to the volume sold and the price |
| Capital expenditure (CAPEX) | − | additional exploration, well drilling, field development, pipelines, oil and gas treatment plants | mostly before production starts; some later: new wells, expansion of facilities |
| Operating expenditure (OPEX) | − | staff, electricity and fuel, chemicals, routine maintenance, transport of the product | all the time the facilities operate; part of it grows with production |
| Taxes and payments to the state | − | bonuses (one-off payments to the state), royalty or mineral extraction tax (payments based on the volume or value produced), income tax, other payments under the contract | bonuses at the signing of the contract or after a discovery; production-based payments when production starts; income tax when profit appears, often with a delay |
| Abandonment | − | plugging and abandoning wells (sealing them for good), dismantling equipment, land reclamation (restoring the land) | at the end of the field's life |
Abandonment costs are often classed as capital expenditure. Here they are shown separately because they fall at the end of the project, when there is no income any more.
It is convenient to combine all payments to the state into one item. For the cash flow it does not matter what a payment is legally called. What matters is how much it takes from the project, and when. The lesson Petroleum fiscal systems and taxation covers how these payments are structured. The lesson Cash flow model of an oil and gas project covers how production, prices and costs are forecast year by year.
- net cash flow of period : positive means the project brought in money, negative means it needed money, US$ million (or another currency)
- revenue of the period, US$ million
- capital expenditure of the period, including abandonment costs, US$ million
- operating expenditure of the period, US$ million
- taxes and other payments to the state for the period, US$ million
Units: any currency, the same for all items; all amounts refer to the same period
- the period includes all incremental receipts and payments of the project, assigned to the moment of their actual payment
- costs and taxes are written as positive amounts and are subtracted; depreciation is not in the formula because it is not a payment
- all items are expressed in the same monetary units: one currency and one kind of prices — nominal or constant
NCF shows what the project did to the company's money over the period. The sequence of NCFs by year is the input data for all the efficiency indicators.
Capital and operating expenditure
Capital expenditure creates or expands what will work for years: a well, a plant, a pipeline. Operating expenditure keeps what has already been created working: it pays for staff, energy, chemicals and routine maintenance.
The boundary between them is not always obvious. Before production starts, almost all spending is classed as capital. After start-up, the same kind of work can fall into either category. Routine well servicing is usually operating expenditure. A major repair (workover) that switches the well to another reservoir layer, or the drilling of a sidetrack (a new branch from the existing well), is more often capital. The company's accounting rules and the tax legislation decide.
If both kinds of cost are outflows, why distinguish them? There are two reasons.
- Taxes. Operating expenditure, as a rule, reduces taxable profit in the same year. Capital expenditure is deducted gradually, through depreciation, over several years. The total of the deductions is the same, but it comes later. This means that the tax is paid earlier.
- Reporting. In accounting, capital expenditure becomes an asset and is written off to expense in parts, while operating expenditure reduces profit at once. So with the same payments, more capital expenditure means higher reported profit in the nearest years. For the financial statements this can look advantageous. For the cash flow it does not, because the tax goes out earlier.
Which flows belong to the project
Any decision changes the company's future. We appraise not all of the company's money but the difference between two versions of the future: “with the project” and “without the project”. This is the incremental cash flow. The comparison is “with” and “without”, not “before” and “after”, because production from the old wells would have declined even without the new project.
- Sunk costs are not counted. The money already spent on seismic surveys and an exploration well cannot be recovered whatever decision is taken. For the decision to develop, only future flows matter. The exception is the future consequences of past costs: if they can still be deducted from the tax base (the profit on which tax is calculated), this tax saving is an incremental flow.
- Opportunity costs are counted. If the project takes up spare capacity in the company's own pipeline that would otherwise be let to other companies, the lost transport fee is a cost of the project, although no one makes a payment.
- Side effects are counted. A new well that partly takes oil from neighbouring wells in the same accumulation (an oil pool in the ground) brings only the increase in production, not its whole flow rate (see Acceleration projects and incremental analysis).
- The company's overheads are counted only if the project really changes them: new office staff — yes, a share of the rent of an existing office — no.
- Financing is usually not mixed with the project. Loans, interest and their repayment are not included in the project's cash flow, and the cost of money is taken into account through the discount rate. To subtract interest and then discount again is to count the cost of money twice.
The cash flow model: period, moment and monetary units
A cash flow model is a table with the items in its rows and the periods in its columns. It simplifies reality: instead of thousands of payments, a few sums a year. The level of detail depends on the task: monitoring a budget, calculating taxes or making an investment decision. A model should not be more precise than its source data. Four choices decide its structure.
- Period
- Usually a calendar year. A half-year is used when the calculation of some tax needs it, and a month for short projects lasting a few years or less. Do not depart from calendar years without a reason, because budgets, financial statements and taxes are aligned with them.
- Moment of the period's flow
- All the payments of a period are replaced by one sum, the NCF, and assigned to a single moment (the aggregation point). If payments are spread more or less evenly within the year, mid-year is the most accurate. If they are not (for example, there is a large payment at the start of the year), we choose the moment from the actual schedule.
- Time origin
- The date to which the calculated indicators are referred: today, the date of the decision or the start of the project's first year. When flows are simply added up it does not matter, but it becomes essential as soon as the flows are discounted, which means brought back to the money of that date (Discounting and present value).
- Monetary units
- Nominal (money of the day) is the money of the corresponding year, including future inflation (the rise of prices). Such a model can be tied directly to the budget and the calculation of taxes. Constant prices of the base year (real terms) are sums of the same purchasing power, which are easy to compare between years. Do not mix the two in one model (see Inflation: nominal and real money).
Example: the cash flow of a small field
Now we put together the cash flow of an assumed oil field. Two years go on drilling and development. Production starts in the third year, quickly reaches a plateau and then declines. In the tenth year the field is abandoned. The amounts are in constant prices of the base year. The tax regime is simplified for teaching purposes and does not reproduce the legislation of any country.
- Year
- 1
- Production, million bbl
- —
- Revenue
- —
- CAPEX and abandonment
- −50.0
- OPEX
- —
- Taxes
- —
- NCF
- −50.0
- Cumulative NCF
- −50.0
- Year
- 2
- Production, million bbl
- —
- Revenue
- —
- CAPEX and abandonment
- −90.0
- OPEX
- —
- Taxes
- —
- NCF
- −90.0
- Cumulative NCF
- −140.0
- Year
- 3
- Production, million bbl
- 1.6
- Revenue
- 80.0
- CAPEX and abandonment
- −20.0
- OPEX
- −14.0
- Taxes
- −13.2
- NCF
- 32.8
- Cumulative NCF
- −107.2
- Year
- 4
- Production, million bbl
- 2.4
- Revenue
- 120.0
- CAPEX and abandonment
- —
- OPEX
- −18.0
- Taxes
- −23.6
- NCF
- 78.4
- Cumulative NCF
- −28.8
- Year
- 5
- Production, million bbl
- 2.4
- Revenue
- 120.0
- CAPEX and abandonment
- —
- OPEX
- −18.0
- Taxes
- −23.6
- NCF
- 78.4
- Cumulative NCF
- 49.6
- Year
- 6
- Production, million bbl
- 2.0
- Revenue
- 100.0
- CAPEX and abandonment
- —
- OPEX
- −16.0
- Taxes
- −18.4
- NCF
- 65.6
- Cumulative NCF
- 115.2
- Year
- 7
- Production, million bbl
- 1.6
- Revenue
- 80.0
- CAPEX and abandonment
- —
- OPEX
- −14.0
- Taxes
- −13.2
- NCF
- 52.8
- Cumulative NCF
- 168.0
- Year
- 8
- Production, million bbl
- 1.2
- Revenue
- 60.0
- CAPEX and abandonment
- —
- OPEX
- −12.0
- Taxes
- −14.4
- NCF
- 33.6
- Cumulative NCF
- 201.6
- Year
- 9
- Production, million bbl
- 0.8
- Revenue
- 40.0
- CAPEX and abandonment
- —
- OPEX
- −10.0
- Taxes
- −9.2
- NCF
- 20.8
- Cumulative NCF
- 222.4
- Year
- 10
- Production, million bbl
- —
- Revenue
- —
- CAPEX and abandonment
- −12.0
- OPEX
- —
- Taxes
- —
- NCF
- −12.0
- Cumulative NCF
- 210.4
- Year
- Total
- Production, million bbl
- 12.0
- Revenue
- 600.0
- CAPEX and abandonment
- −172.0
- OPEX
- −102.0
- Taxes
- −115.6
- NCF
- 210.4
- Cumulative NCF
- —
| Year | Production, million bbl | Revenue | CAPEX and abandonment | OPEX | Taxes | NCF | Cumulative NCF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | — | — | −50.0 | — | — | −50.0 | −50.0 |
| 2 | — | — | −90.0 | — | — | −90.0 | −140.0 |
| 3 | 1.6 | 80.0 | −20.0 | −14.0 | −13.2 | 32.8 | −107.2 |
| 4 | 2.4 | 120.0 | — | −18.0 | −23.6 | 78.4 | −28.8 |
| 5 | 2.4 | 120.0 | — | −18.0 | −23.6 | 78.4 | 49.6 |
| 6 | 2.0 | 100.0 | — | −16.0 | −18.4 | 65.6 | 115.2 |
| 7 | 1.6 | 80.0 | — | −14.0 | −13.2 | 52.8 | 168.0 |
| 8 | 1.2 | 60.0 | — | −12.0 | −14.4 | 33.6 | 201.6 |
| 9 | 0.8 | 40.0 | — | −10.0 | −9.2 | 20.8 | 222.4 |
| 10 | — | — | −12.0 | — | — | −12.0 | 210.4 |
| Total | 12.0 | 600.0 | −172.0 | −102.0 | −115.6 | 210.4 | — |
Outflows are shown with a “−” sign. Taxes are the sum of the royalty (10% of revenue) and income tax (20%). The data in this example are assumed for illustration.
- Oil price
- $50/bbl (assumed, constant)
- Production in years 3–9
- 1.6; 2.4; 2.4; 2.0; 1.6; 1.2; 0.8 million bbl, 12 million bbl in all (≈ 1.64 million tonnes)
- Capital expenditure
- $50, $90 and $20 million in years 1–3
- Operating expenditure
- $6 million a year + $5/bbl
- Royalty
- 10% of revenue
- Income tax
- 20%; capital expenditure is depreciated in equal parts over 5 years from the start of production
- Abandonment
- $12 million in year 10
- Revenue of year 4: million dollars. In tonnes this is about 328 thousand tonnes a year at an oil density of 0.86 t/m³.
- Operating expenditure: million dollars; royalty: million dollars.
- Depreciation for tax: million dollars a year in years 3–7. Taxable profit: million dollars; income tax: million dollars.
- Net cash flow of year 4: million dollars. Depreciation is not subtracted here: it is not a payment, and was needed only to calculate the tax.
- The other years are calculated in the same way (the table above), and the NCF is accumulated. The minimum of the cumulative flow is −140 million dollars at the end of year 2. In year 5 it becomes positive (after about 4.4 years from the start of the investment, if the flow of year 5 arrives evenly). By the end of the project it is 210.4 million dollars.
What it means. These three numbers are the simplest indicators of a project: the maximum cash outlay, the payback period and the cumulative flow at the end of the project (the lesson Cumulative cash flow and payback period covers them in detail). But they do not take into account when the money arrives. Millions received in year 8 are worth noticeably less today than the millions invested in year 1. Discounting (bringing sums of different years back to today's money) corrects this, and the indicator it gives is NPV. The data in this example are assumed for illustration.
Bar chart by year, from year 1 to year 10: in years 1 and 2 the bars point down, minus 50 and minus 90 million dollars; from year 3 to year 9 they point up, the tallest in years 4 and 5, at about 78 million; in year 10 there is a small bar pointing down, minus 12. The cumulative line falls to minus 140 million at the end of year 2, crosses zero in year 5, rises to 222 million in year 9 and ends at 210 million.
This shape is typical of production projects. First come several years of negative flow for additional exploration, drilling and development. Then production grows fast up to the plateau. After that it declines gradually as production falls, until the income stops covering operating expenditure (this point is the economic limit). At the end comes an outflow for abandonment. Income tax in the first years of production is often small, because depreciation deductions reduce it, and it grows later. In the example this can be seen in year 8: revenue is lower than in year 7, but taxes are higher, because the depreciation has ended.
Why cash flow and not profit
Profit in the financial statements answers the question of how the company performed over the year. It is calculated under accrual rules (income and costs belong to the period they relate to, not to the moment of payment): income is assigned to the period of sale, and capital expenditure is spread over the years through depreciation. Cash flow answers a different question: how much money the project took or brought in, and when.
- Depreciation reduces profit but not money: the money went out earlier, when the equipment was paid for.
- Capital expenditure reduces money at once, and profit gradually. In the construction years the project absorbs tens and hundreds of millions, but in the profit statement this is hardly visible.
- Profit depends on the accounting policy: the depreciation method, the classification of costs as capital, and provisions (money set aside for future costs). Cash flow is the fact of money moving. The choice of accounting method affects it only through taxes.
- To assess value, we need the moment of payment. Only money actually received can be invested, spent or paid out to shareholders, and the value of a sum depends on when it is received.
Over the whole life of a project, total profit and total net cash flow are the same, provided all the capital expenditure is eventually written off. What differs is how they are spread over time, and the value of the project depends on exactly this.
- Project
- from the example above
- Profit after tax
- revenue − royalty − operating expenditure − depreciation − income tax; abandonment is an expense of the year it is paid
- Year 2: 90 million dollars was paid for construction, there is no revenue, and depreciation has not yet begun. The cash flow of the year is −90 million dollars, and the profit is 0: the costs became an asset.
- Year 4: the cash flow is 78.4 million dollars, the profit is million dollars. The difference of 32 million dollars is exactly the depreciation of this year.
- Over all 10 years: the sum of profit is 210.4 million dollars, the sum of NCF 210.4 million dollars.
What it means. For an investment decision the amounts and moments of money movements matter, because the need for financing and, after discounting, the value of the project depend on them. Profit is needed for other purposes: reporting, taxes and dividends. The data in this example are assumed for illustration.
Terms and symbols
- Inflow and outflow
- An inflow is money coming into the project (sign “+”). An outflow is a payment out of the project (sign “−”).
- Net cash flow (NCF)
- The sum of all the project's inflows and outflows over a period.
- Cumulative cash flow
- The sum of NCF from the start of the project to a given period. Its minimum is the maximum cash outlay.
- Capital expenditure (CAPEX)
- The cost of creating or expanding assets that work for years. For tax and reporting it is written off through depreciation.
- Operating expenditure (OPEX)
- The cost of keeping existing facilities working. It is usually deducted from the tax base in the same year.
- Depreciation
- The spreading of capital expenditure over the years for reporting and taxes. It is not a payment in itself.
- Incremental flow
- The difference between the company's cash flows “with the project” and “without the project”.
- Sunk costs
- Costs already spent that do not depend on the decision and are not part of its appraisal.
Common mistakes and misconceptions
“The project is attractive: according to the financial statements it makes a profit from the first year of production.”
Profit does not show how much money has been invested and when it will come back. A project can show a profit in the financial statements and still fail to return the money invested at the required return. Only the cash flow shows this.
“Depreciation has to be deducted from the cash flow as a cost.”
Depreciation is not a payment. The money went out in the year the equipment was paid for, and it was already deducted there as capital expenditure. To deduct depreciation as well is double counting. Depreciation is needed only to calculate income tax.
“Exploration costs must be included in the appraisal of development, otherwise the project looks better than it is.”
For the decision to develop, only the future flows that depend on it matter. Past costs cannot be recovered whatever the decision. Only their future tax consequences are counted, if there are any.
“A payment belongs to the year the contract was signed.”
In a cash flow, a payment belongs to the moment of actual payment. An advance, payment on delivery or payment by instalments under the same contract give different cash flows.
“Interest on a loan is a cost of the project and must be deducted from NCF.”
When a project is appraised, its flows are usually calculated without regard to how it is financed, and the cost of money is taken into account through the discount rate. To subtract interest and discount again is double counting.
In depth: advanced detail
Nominal money and constant prices in the model
A nominal model describes the sums that will actually be paid and received, taking future inflation into account. For this it needs an explicit assumption about the rate of inflation, and the more distant the year, the less certain this assumption is. A model in constant prices describes the same operations in money of the same purchasing power. If inflation is constant, a flow can be converted from nominal money into constant prices of the base year like this:
- sum of year in the nominal money of that year, US$ million
- the same sum in constant prices of the base year , US$ million of the base year
- annual rate of inflation (a fraction), —
- number of years from the base year to year , years
Units: any currency; numerator and denominator in the same units
- the rate of inflation is constant; if it changes, divide by the product of the annual indices
- for costs, use a suitable price index, general or specific to the sector; the oil price is set by the market and may not follow inflation
For example, at inflation of 5% a year, 100 million dollars of year 5 in the prices of year 1 is million dollars.
Tax deductions for depreciation are set by the nominal cost of the equipment in the year of purchase, and they do not grow with inflation. So with high inflation their real value falls and the real tax burden rises. A model built in constant prices from the start does not see this. This is one more reason to calculate taxes in nominal money and only then convert the NCF into constant prices.
Several currencies and exchange rate risk
Each conversion from one currency to another adds an assumption about the exchange rate to the model, and therefore a risk. Suppose revenue is in dollars and a significant part of costs and taxes is in tenge. If the tenge weakens, these costs become smaller when converted into dollars, and the dollar cash flow improves. If the tenge strengthens, the cash flow gets worse. Over time the effect is partly offset by the growth of local prices, so the model sets the exchange rate and inflation consistently with each other.
That is why it is useful to keep costs in the model in the currency in which they are paid, and to convert them at a rate set in a separate row. Then we can test the effect of the exchange rate in the same way as the effect of the oil price, by sensitivity analysis (changing one input and watching how the result changes; Sensitivity analysis and scenarios).
Connections to other topics
- Cash flow model of an oil and gas project — how production, prices, costs and taxes of a real project are forecast year by year.
- Cumulative cash flow and payback period — the maximum cash outlay, the payback period and other indicators of the cumulative flow.
- Discounting and present value — why money of different years cannot simply be added up.
- Net present value (NPV) — how the main indicator of a project's value is found from the cash flow.
- Inflation: nominal and real money — nominal money and constant prices, conversion by indices.
- Valuation methods: book value and market value — how valuation from cash flow differs from book and market valuation.
Check yourself
- 1
A contract for the supply of pumps was signed in November, the pumps were received in December and were paid for in January of the following year. To which moment does a cash flow model assign the outflow?
- A.To December — the date of delivery
- B.To November — the date the contract was signed
- C.To January of the following year — the date of payment
- D.It spreads it equally over the three months
Show the answer
Correct answer: C. To January of the following year — the date of payment
Cash flow reflects the actual movement of money, so the payment is assigned to the moment of payment. The date of the contract and the date of delivery matter for accounting and logistics, but at those moments the money has not yet gone out.
- 2
Which of the following is not a cash flow of the project?
- A.Payment for electricity
- B.Royalty
- C.Depreciation of equipment
- D.Income tax
Show the answer
Correct answer: C. Depreciation of equipment
Depreciation is the spreading of a capital payment, already made, over the years for reporting and taxes. No one pays any money at that moment. Depreciation affects cash flow only indirectly, by reducing income tax.
- 3
Over a year a project's revenue was $200 million, operating expenditure was 50, capital expenditure 30, taxes 40 and depreciation 25 million dollars. Find the net cash flow of the year.
Show the answer
million dollars. Depreciation is not subtracted: it is not a payment. It is already reflected in the amount of taxes, if the income tax was calculated with it deducted.
- 4
A company has already spent $30 million on exploration. Development will need another $100 million and will bring a cash flow that is enough to pay back 100 million at the required return, but not 130. Is it worth developing the field?
- A.No: the project does not pay back the whole $130 million
- B.The exploration costs must first be recovered through another project
- C.Yes: the $30 million has been spent whatever the decision, and only the future 100 million matters for the decision
Show the answer
Correct answer: C. Yes: the $30 million has been spent whatever the decision, and only the future 100 million matters for the decision
The exploration costs are sunk: refusing to develop will not bring them back. We compare the future “with the project” and “without the project”. If the future receipts pay back the future 100 million dollars at the required return, development increases the company's wealth. Only the tax consequences of past costs are counted, if there are any.
- 5
Why does moving part of the costs from operating to capital, with the same payments, worsen the cash flow although it improves the reported profit of the nearest years?
Show the answer
Operating expenditure reduces the tax base at once, while capital expenditure does so gradually, through depreciation. The total deduction is the same, but it comes later, so the tax is paid earlier. In the financial statements it is the other way round: capital expenditure becomes an asset and reduces profit in parts, so the nearest years look more profitable.
- 6
What does the cumulative cash flow of a field development project usually look like?
- A.It first falls to a minimum, then grows and may fall slightly at the end because of abandonment
- B.It grows from the first year to the end of the project
- C.It fluctuates around zero
- D.It first grows, then falls to a minimum at the end of the project
Show the answer
Correct answer: A. It first falls to a minimum, then grows and may fall slightly at the end because of abandonment
The first years go on capital expenditure, so the cumulative flow falls to a minimum, the maximum cash outlay. After production starts it grows and crosses zero (payback). By the end it reaches a terminal cash surplus (the final total of the cumulative flow), which abandonment costs reduce slightly.
Updated: 19 October 2026