Skip to content
Brent$117.6Gas TTF$1,192USD453.87 ₸
MunaiHub
GeoscienceStructural geology Intermediate 28 min read

Structural styles and tectonic history

A structural style, or structural family, is a typical set of folds, faults and other structures. It forms under one type of deformation: extension (stretching), compression (squeezing), strike-slip (sideways sliding), inversion (compression of a basin that was first stretched) or salt flow. The same style recurs in basins of different regions. The tectonic history of an area is the sequence of deformation and sedimentation events there. We reconstruct it from how the structures and the rock units relate to one another.

Why it matters

There are always fewer data than we would like. Seismic lines are few, the image is poor beneath salt and in fold belts, and there are only a handful of wells. Once we recognise the style, we can predict the structures between the data points: which traps to expect and where, how far they continue along strike and with depth, how the faults link up, and where the rock is fractured. Tectonic history answers the question that decides the fate of a prospect (a possible drilling target): did the trap exist when the oil passed through it, and did later deformation destroy it? Field development depends on the same structures too: how the blocks are divided into compartments, the directions of fractures, and the present-day stresses.

Quick refresher

  • Three conditions set the style: which principal stress is vertical, whether the basement (the old rock beneath the sediments) takes part in the deformation, and whether the section has weak layers along which the rock sequence can slide (salt, or shales with abnormally high pore pressure). The type of basin hints at the style, but not clearly, because basins go through several stages.
  • Extension gives normal faults, tilted blocks, half-grabens (down-dropped blocks bounded by a fault on one side) and rollover anticlines. The blocks rotate together with the faults, and in the domino model the stretching is β=sin⁡δ0/sin⁡δ\beta = \sin\delta_0/\sin\delta. The traps are block crests, horsts (raised blocks) and rollover anticlines.
  • Compression gives thrusts that detach from a weak layer, folds above their bends and tips, thrust sheets and duplexes (stacks of thrust sheets). The structures continue along strike for tens of kilometres, but they are complicated at depth.
  • Strike-slip movement gives en echelon folds (folds set side by side in a staggered row) and normal faults at an angle to the main fault, flower structures in cross-section, basins at releasing bends and uplifts at restraining bends. The structure changes quickly along strike.
  • Inversion turns a half-graben into an anticline: the old normal fault works as a reverse fault. Below the null point the displacement on it remains normal. Above it, the displacement becomes reverse.
  • We read the sequence of events from cross-cutting relationships, unconformities and changes in thickness. The trap must form before the oil migrates, and late deformation must not breach it (open it up).
Key relationships
β=sin⁡δ0sin⁡δ,δ0=δ+δb\beta = \frac{\sin\delta_0}{\sin\delta},\qquad \delta_0 = \delta + \delta_b

stretching from the rotation of rigid blocks, found from the present dip of the faults δ\delta and the tilt of the beds in the blocks δb\delta_b

αR=φ2,αT=45°,αF=−45°\alpha_R = \frac{\varphi}{2},\quad \alpha_T = 45°,\quad \alpha_F = -45°

angles of Riedel shears (small faults that form at an angle to the main fault), normal faults and folds to the strike of a right-lateral strike-slip fault (measured clockwise; for a left-lateral one, anticlockwise), tan φ=μ\mathrm{tan}\,\varphi = \mu

EI=hhwhfw,Δt=hhw−hfwEI = \frac{h_{hw}}{h_{fw}},\qquad \Delta t = h_{hw} - h_{fw}

expansion index of a unit and the increase in the throw of the fault during the time the unit accumulated

tnet(y)=text(y)−trevt_{net}(y) = t_{ext}(y) - t_{rev}

net throw of the inverted fault; at the null point it is zero

Common pitfalls
  • Assuming that the type of basin decides the structural style on its own: later stages of deformation are laid over earlier ones.
  • Taking the tilt of the beds in the blocks as original (primary), and ignoring the rotation of the blocks when estimating the stretching.
  • Expecting structures that continue along a strike-slip zone as steadily as they do in a fold-and-thrust belt.
  • Naming the type of a fault from one horizon only: in an inverted normal fault the deep horizons are displaced as by a normal fault and the shallow ones as by a reverse fault.
  • Judging when a trap formed from its present shape, without analysing thicknesses and unconformities.

After this lesson you can

  • recognise the deformation regime (extension, compression, strike-slip, inversion or salt flow) from the combination of structures, and name the traps and risks typical of each style
  • estimate the extension (how much the crust has been stretched) from the tilt of blocks in the domino model, where rigid fault blocks rotate like falling books, and check whether the initial dip of the faults is plausible
  • predict the directions of folds, normal faults and shear fractures in a strike-slip zone from its strike and sense of displacement, and tell releasing bends (where the crust is stretched) from restraining bends (where it is squeezed)
  • reconstruct the sequence of events from cross-cutting relationships, growth strata (layers that thicken because the fault moved while they were being laid down) and unconformities, and date the activity of a fault from the expansion index
  • find the null point of an inverted normal fault, and decide whether the trap had formed by the time the oil arrived and whether late deformation breached it

Structural style: from stresses to a set of structures

Deformation never creates a single structure. Extension does not produce one lone normal fault. It produces a system of normal faults with tilted blocks, half-grabens, transfer zones (where one fault system hands over to another) and folds in the hanging walls. Compression produces a system of thrusts and folds. Strike-slip movement produces slanting chains of folds and faults. Such recurring combinations are called structural styles, or structural families. We can recognise the style from a few observations, such as one or two seismic lines, several wells or a geological map. Then we can predict which structures must exist where there are no data, and how they are linked to each other. There is no single agreed list of styles, but everyone recognises the main ones.

Three conditions set the style. The first is which of the principal stresses is vertical. It decides the prevailing type of faults (Anderson's model). The second is whether the basement takes part in the deformation. If the sedimentary cover slides along a weak layer over an almost undeformed basement, we call it thin-skinned deformation. If the faults cut the basement too, we call it thick-skinned deformation. The third is whether the section has weak layers: salt, or shales with abnormally high pore pressure. Detachments (surfaces along which the upper rocks slide) form along them. The rock sequence above a detachment deforms in one way, and the sequence below it in another, so the structures of one tier do not continue into the other.

The main structural styles
Style
Extension
Setting
σ1\sigma_1 vertical; rifts, passive margins
Structures
normal faults, tilted blocks, half-grabens, rollover anticlines
Traps
block crests, horsts, rollover anticlines
Main risks
fault seal, erosion of the crests
Style
Compression
Setting
σ3\sigma_3 vertical; fold-and-thrust belts
Structures
thrusts, thrust sheets, duplexes, folds above thrusts
Traps
anticlines above thrusts, subthrust structures
Main risks
structure at depth, seismic quality, overpressure
Style
Strike-slip
Setting
σ2\sigma_2 vertical; plate boundaries, large intraplate faults
Structures
en echelon folds and normal faults, flower structures
Traps
en echelon anticlines, blocks beside the fault
Main risks
rapid change of structure, division into separate compartments
Style
Inversion
Setting
compression after extension
Structures
reverse faults in place of normal faults, anticlines above former depressions
Traps
inversion anticlines
Main risks
breaching of traps, uplift of source rocks out of the oil window
Style
Salt and gravity gliding
Setting
loading of salt or ductile shales by sediments
Structures
domes, diapirs, minibasins; normal faults at the top of the slope, thrusts at its toe
Traps
crests above salt, beds against the walls of domes
Main risks
windows in the salt, seismic imaging beneath salt
Style
Drape over basement blocks
Setting
movements on steep basement faults; platforms
Structures
gentle drape folds that die out upwards
Traps
gentle uplifts above basement highs
Main risks
small closure

A summary, not a strict classification. In one basin the styles follow one another in time and combine in space.

The style is related to the type of basin (basin types). Rifts are stretched. Foreland basins (basins in front of a mountain range) are crumpled from the side of the mountains. Strike-slip basins develop in the strike-slip style. On passive margins (continental edges that are not plate boundaries), sediments glide down the slope and squeeze out salt. But the relationship is not clear-cut. A basin that began with extension may be compressed later, and its normal faults come back to life with the opposite sense of displacement. One style is laid on top of another. So we determine the style from the observed structures, such as the type and direction of the displacements and the relationships between thicknesses. The type of basin is only a hint about where to look for analogues.

Extension: domino faults, listric faults and rifts

When the crust is stretched, normal faults break its upper, brittle part into blocks. There are two extreme geometries (end-members). Real basins show both, and also the transitions between them.

Domino faults (rotational planar faults)
Rigid blocks are bounded by parallel normal faults that dip the same way. The faults are planar: straight, not curved. As extension grows, the blocks rotate together with the faults, like falling books on a shelf. The faults flatten, and the beds in the blocks tilt in the direction opposite to the dip of the faults. One edge of a block is the footwall (the block below the fault) of the neighbouring fault. That edge is raised and forms the crest of the tilted block. The opposite edge is in the hanging wall (the block above the fault) of its own fault. It is lowered, and a half-graben depression forms above it.
Listric fault
The fault surface is curved. It is steep near the surface, then flattens with depth and merges into a detachment. The hanging wall slides down the curved surface and sags towards the fault, and a rollover anticline forms (rollover; folds and faults). To sag, the wall is stretched. Opposing (antithetic) normal faults and small grabens appear at the crest of the anticline.
Detachment faults and metamorphic core complexes
In very strong extension, the upper crust slides along low-angle detachment faults, and rocks from the deep parts of the crust rise from beneath it. The domes of deep rock that heat and pressure have changed (metamorphic rock) are called metamorphic core complexes. Such structures are rare in petroleum basins, but they show where the stretching “goes” in strongly stretched rifts.
Styles of extension: domino and listric faultsdomino: planar faults, rigid blockspost-rift sequenceblock crestsyn-rift wedgenormal faultpre-rift sequencelistric fault and rollover anticlinelistric faultrollover anticlineantithetic faultdetachmentsyn-rift wedge

Two cross-sections, one above the other. The upper one shows a row of identical blocks of grey pre-rift layers. Parallel sloping fault lines, dipping to the right, separate the blocks. The layers inside the blocks are tilted to the left, so the upper right corner of each block is raised: this is the crest. Above the lowered left edge of each block lies an orange triangular wedge of syn-rift deposits. It is thickest next to the fault on the left, and it thins out towards the crest of the same block at the next fault. A horizontal blue post-rift sequence covers everything. The labels are: post-rift sequence, syn-rift wedge, block crest, pre-rift sequence, normal fault. The lower cross-section shows, on the right, the footwall with horizontal layers. A curved fault surface goes steeply down and to the left from the surface and passes into a horizontal detachment. The layers of the hanging wall on the left are bent down towards the fault and form a gentle anticline. Closer to the main fault there is a small normal fault dipping towards it, and the block between them is lowered. The upper, orange, layers of the hanging wall thicken towards the fault. The labels are: listric fault, rollover anticline, antithetic fault, syn-rift wedge, detachment.

SchematicTwo extreme styles of extension (schematic). Above: domino blocks with planar (straight) normal faults dipping at 42°, and beds tilted by 18° in the opposite direction, as in the example below. Syn-rift wedges (sediments laid down while the crust was stretching) fill the half-grabens, and the post-rift sequence (laid down after the stretching) lies undisturbed. Below: a listric fault that flattens into a detachment, a rollover anticline in the hanging wall with an antithetic fault, and a syn-rift wedge that thickens towards the fault.

A real rift consists of half-grabens tens of kilometres long (fault groups). The main fault of a half-graben dips one way, and along the rift the direction may change. Neighbouring half-grabens are linked by transfer zones (also called accommodation zones), where the displacement passes from one fault to another (transfer zones). Syn-rift deposits fill the half-grabens as wedges that thicken towards the main fault. The dip of the layers in the wedge decreases upwards, because the lower layers rotated together with the block for longer. The crests of the blocks beside the main faults rise and may be eroded. They then supply coarse clastic material (broken fragments of rock) to the neighbouring depressions. After the extension, post-rift sequences lie undisturbed over the whole system (syn-rift and post-rift stages).

Stretching from the rotation of rigid blocks (domino model)
β=LL0=sin⁡δ0sin⁡δ,δ0=δ+δb\beta = \frac{L}{L_0} = \frac{\sin\delta_0}{\sin\delta},\qquad \delta_0 = \delta + \delta_b
where:
  • β\betastretching factor: how many times a section across the strike of the faults has lengthened, —
  • L, L0L,\ L_0present and original horizontal distance between neighbouring faults, km
  • δ\deltapresent dip of the faults, °
  • δ0\delta_0dip of the faults at the time they formed, °
  • δb\delta_btilt of the beds in the blocks — the angle through which the blocks have rotated (the notation of the lesson on faults), °

Units: angles in degrees; LL and L0L_0 in the same units of length

Holds when
  • The faults are planar (straight, not curved) and parallel, and the blocks rotate as rigid bodies about axes parallel to the strike.
  • Before extension the beds were horizontal. We measure the tilt of the beds and the dip of the faults in a section across the strike of the faults, otherwise the angles are apparent (apparent dip).
  • The formula describes the extension of only the upper brittle crust cut by these faults, not of the whole lithosphere.

When the blocks rotate, the distance between neighbouring parallel faults measured at right angles to them does not change. Measured horizontally, it equals that distance divided by sin⁡δ\sin\delta. This gives the formula (the derivation is in the advanced section). The stretching grows faster and faster with rotation. At δ0=60°\delta_0 = 60°, a rotation of 10° gives β≈1.13\beta \approx 1.13, a rotation of 20° gives 1.35, and a rotation of 30° gives 1.73. If the blocks were also deformed inside, by small faults or bending, the same tilt of the beds corresponds to a different extension, and the formula gives only an estimate.

Worked exampleExtension from the tilt of blocks
Given (assumed data)
Present dip of the faults (depth section across the strike)
42°
Tilt of the pre-rift beds in the blocks
18°, in the direction opposite to the dip of the faults
Horizontal distance between neighbouring faults
3.2 km
Friction coefficient for the check
0.6
Solution
  1. Initial dip of the faults: δ0=42°+18°=60°\delta_0 = 42° + 18° = 60°. New normal faults at μ=0.6\mu = 0.6 dip at about 60° (Anderson's model). So the faults formed with the usual dip for normal faults, and they have rotated together with the blocks since then.
  2. Stretching factor: β=sin⁡60°/sin⁡42°=0.8660/0.6691=1.294\beta = \sin 60°/\sin 42° = 0.8660/0.6691 = 1.294, that is, extension by 29.4%.
  3. Original distance between the faults: 3.2/1.294=2.473.2/1.294 = 2.47 km. Measured at right angles to the faults, the distance between them is the same as before: 3.2⋅sin⁡42°=2.143.2\cdot\sin 42° = 2.14 km.
Answer: The upper crust has been stretched by a factor of about 1.29, that is, by 29%. Blocks that were about 2.5 km wide have moved apart to 3.2 km.

What it means. The initial dip agrees with the one that Anderson's model gives. This supports the rigid-block model. Had the initial angle come out much steeper than 70° or gentler than 50°, we would have to check whether the blocks were deformed inside. With vertical shear spread through the block, the same tilt of the beds corresponds to an initial dip of about 51°, and the stretching comes out different. We compare the stretching on faults with the stretching of the whole crust, which we find from its thinning and from the subsidence of the basin (lithospheric stretching model). In many rifts and on many passive margins, the stretching on the visible faults is much less. The reason is debated. Some faults have not been recognised: they may be too small for seismic to resolve (power law), rotated, or cut by later faults. Part of the stretching may also have gone into the lower crust and the mantle. The data in this example are assumed for illustration.

Stretching of domino blocks as a function of their rotation051015202530351.01.21.41.61.82.02.2Tilt of beds in the blocks δb, °Stretching factor βexample: β = 1.29δ₀ = 45°δ₀ = 60°δ₀ = 75°

A graph. The horizontal axis is the tilt of the beds in the blocks, that is, their rotation, from 0 to 35 degrees. The vertical axis is the stretching factor, from 1 to 2.2. Three curves start at one and rise more and more steeply. The fastest is for an initial dip of 45 degrees (about 2.07 at a rotation of 25 degrees; at about 26 degrees the curve reaches the top of the graph). The next is for 60 degrees (about 2.05 at 35 degrees), and the slowest is for 75 degrees (about 1.5 at 35 degrees). The example point is marked on the 60-degree curve: a rotation of 18 degrees, and a stretching of about 1.29.

CalculatedStretching factor of domino blocks against their rotation, for initial fault dips of 45°, 60° and 75°, from the formula β=sin⁡δ0/sin⁡(δ0−δb)\beta = \sin\delta_0/\sin(\delta_0 - \delta_b). The point is the example above.

The traps of rifts are: the raised crests of tilted blocks and horsts; rollover anticlines in the hanging walls of listric faults; and syn-rift sandstones that pinch out on the slopes of half-grabens. The source rocks are the deep-water lake and marine shales of the half-grabens, and the seals are post-rift shales (petroleum systems of basins). The main risks are these. Does the fault that bounds the crest seal (fault seal)? Has erosion removed the crest together with the reservoir? Into how many blocks do the faults divide the accumulation?

An example from Kazakhstan is the South Turgai Basin (basins of Kazakhstan). In the Early to Middle Jurassic a rift of alternating grabens and horsts formed here. From west to east they are the Aryskum, Akshabulak, Sarylan and Bozingen grabens, separated by horsts. People link the start of the rift with right-lateral strike-slip movement on the Karatau–Talas–Fergana fault zone. Seismic sections show the flower structures typical of strike-slip faults, and in plan view the faults are arranged en echelon. In the Late Jurassic and the Late Cretaceous the basin was inverted twice. Oil and gas accumulations are concentrated mainly on horsts, on the slopes of grabens and on both sides of the strike-slip zone. So one basin shows three styles at once: extension, strike-slip and inversion.

Compression: fold-and-thrust belts

A fold-and-thrust belt is a zone along the edge of a mountain range. It is tens to hundreds of kilometres wide and hundreds to thousands of kilometres long. In it the sedimentary sequence has been shortened by tens of per cent: it is folded and cut by thrusts. Most often only the cover is deformed. The thrusts detach from a weak layer (salt, clays or mudstones) and run along it on a detachment surface (décollement). Then they cut up through the sequence on a ramp and run along a bed again (ramps and flats). The basement beneath the belt dips towards the mountains and is only weakly deformed.

Thrusts grow one after another. A new thrust forms ahead of the front of the belt, in the footwall of the previous one, and carries the older sheets on its back. So deformation generally gets younger towards the foreland basin (foreland basins). Closely spaced thrusts with the same direction, which meet at depth on a common detachment, form an imbricate fan (a stack of thrust sheets like overlapping roof tiles). If common surfaces bound the sheets above and below (the roof thrust and the floor thrust), and each sheet is thrust over its neighbour, the structure is a duplex. Folds grow above the bends and tips of thrusts (fault-related folds).

A fold-and-thrust belt in section1234movement of sheetsimbricate fanfold abovethe thrust tipforelandbasinbasementweak layer — detachmentroof thrustfloor thrustduplexduplex sheetsthrust oneover another

A cross-section that spans the whole width of the picture. At the bottom is a grey basement dipping gently to the left, towards the mountains. On it lies a dark band of weak layer, and above it a layered sequence. On the right, ahead of the belt, the layers lie undisturbed: this is the foreland basin. Further left, three thrusts cut the sequence. They start on the weak layer, run along it, and then rise more and more steeply to the right, up to the surface. The layers in each sheet are bent along its base and cut off by the surface. This is an imbricate fan. To the right, a fourth, youngest thrust does not reach the surface, and above its tip the sequence is bent into an asymmetric fold with a steep front limb. The numbers of the thrusts increase from left to right, towards the front of the belt. An arrow above the section points to the right. Below the section is an inset. Between a horizontal lower thrust (the floor thrust) and an arched upper thrust (the roof thrust) there are three lens-shaped sheets. They are tilted in the same direction and thrust one over another: a duplex. The layers above the roof thrust are arched.

SchematicA fold-and-thrust belt in cross-section (schematic). The thrusts detach from a weak layer above undeformed basement and reach the surface along ramps. At the front of the belt is a fold above the tip of a thrust that has not reached the surface. In the rear is an imbricate fan. Ahead of the belt lies the foreland basin. The inset below shows a duplex between a floor thrust and a roof thrust. The arrow shows the direction in which the sheets moved, and the numbers give the order of the thrusts.

Why are some belts narrow and steep, and others wide and gentle? A belt behaves like a wedge of crumpled rock that is pushed up in front of a moving buttress (a rigid block that pushes), like snow in front of a shovel. The wedge grows until its slope reaches a critical value. Then it advances and adds new sheets. The weaker the base of the wedge, the smaller the critical slope. Above salt or shales with abnormally high pore pressure, the belt turns out wide and gentle, with symmetric folds and thrusts that often dip in both directions. Above a strong base, it is narrow, with a steep front and thrusts that dip in one direction.

When the basement takes part in the deformation, reverse faults go down into the basement. Often they are reactivated normal faults of former rifts (see the section on inversion). Above raised basement blocks, the cover is crumpled into steep, asymmetric folds. On platforms (stable parts of the continents), movements on steep basement faults produce gentle drape folds that die out upwards (drape folds).

The traps of fold-and-thrust belts are: anticlines above thrusts and in the hanging walls of reverse faults; traps beneath thrusts (subthrust traps); and reservoir sheets sealed by thrusts. The structures continue along strike for tens of kilometres, which makes exploration easier. But at depth they are complex. Beneath steep limbs and thrusts the seismic image is poor, the crest shifts with depth (crest and hinge), and pore pressure is often abnormally high (Abnormal formation pressures: origin, prediction and recognition). Folds often grow late, and we compare the time of their growth with the time of oil generation (see the section on charge timing).

Fold belts of different ages surround Kazakhstan. The Urals and the Mugalzhar Hills are the suture (the seam) of a Palaeozoic collision of continents, and the Tien Shan is still being compressed today (plate boundaries). In the Permian–Triassic, compression from the side of the Urals formed the subsalt anticlines of the eastern margin of the Pre-Caspian Basin, such as Zhanazhol (salt of the Pre-Caspian Basin).

Strike-slip faults: en echelon structures, flower structures, bends

In strike-slip movement the blocks slide past each other along a vertical fault. In the zone around the fault, the rocks undergo simple shear (a sideways smearing), especially in the cover above a basement fault. In such a zone, shortening and lengthening act at the same time, at 45° to the fault. So structures of all types grow along a strike-slip fault. Folds and thrusts form across the shortening. Normal faults and joints (cracks that open without sliding) form across the lengthening. There are also shears at a small angle and at a large angle to the fault itself: these are Riedel shears. The synthetic R shears have a displacement of the same sense as the strike-slip fault, and the antithetic R′ shears have the opposite sense. Together they form a slanting, en echelon pattern. This pattern shows both that there is a strike-slip fault and which way it moved.

Directions of structures in a strike-slip zone
αR=φ2,αR′=90°−φ2,αP=−φ2,αT=45°,αF=−45°\alpha_R = \frac{\varphi}{2},\quad \alpha_{R'} = 90° - \frac{\varphi}{2},\quad \alpha_P = -\frac{\varphi}{2},\quad \alpha_T = 45°,\quad \alpha_F = -45°
where:
  • α\alphaangle between the strike of the structure and the strike of the strike-slip fault; for a right-lateral fault it is measured clockwise, for a left-lateral one anticlockwise, °
  • R, R′R,\ R'synthetic and antithetic Riedel shears, —
  • PPP shears, which are also synthetic but rotated the other way; they appear later than R shears and link them, —
  • TTjoints and normal faults, —
  • FFfold axes and the strike of thrusts, —
  • φ\varphiangle of friction: tan φ=μ\mathrm{tan}\,\varphi = \mu (friction on a plane), °

Units: angles in degrees

Holds when
  • Uniform simple shear in a wide zone. The greatest compression is horizontal and at 45° to the zone, and shears form by the Coulomb criterion (a rule for when rock fails in shear) at an angle of 45°−φ/245° - \varphi/2 to it.
  • The angles refer to the beginning of the deformation. As the displacement grows, the structures rotate towards the strike of the strike-slip fault, and the shears merge into a through-going fault.
  • If the blocks also move towards each other (convergence), folds and thrusts lie closer to the strike of the strike-slip fault. If they move apart (divergence), normal faults lie closer to it.

We recognise a right-lateral strike-slip fault because the R shears and normal faults are turned clockwise from its strike, and the folds are turned anticlockwise. For a left-lateral fault it is the other way round. At μ=0.6\mu = 0.6 the angle φ/2\varphi/2 is about 15°, so the R shears are almost parallel to the strike-slip fault and the R′ shears are almost perpendicular to it.

Structures of a right-lateral strike-slip fault in plan and in sectionplan view (north at top)strike-slipfold axes, 45°normal faults, joints, 45°R shears, 15°R′ shears, 75°strain ellipsesection view: flower structurespositive — transpressionnegative — transtension

The upper diagram is a plan view. In the centre is a horizontal line, the strike-slip fault. Arrows show that the upper block moves to the right and the lower one to the left. Above the fault is an ellipse elongated from the lower left to the upper right. Its long axis is the direction of lengthening, and its short axis is the direction of shortening. Along the fault, short fold axes lie en echelon, tilted up to the right at 45 degrees to the fault. Short thick dashes for normal faults and joints are tilted at 45 degrees the other way. Thin lines for R shears deviate from the fault by 15 degrees in the same direction as the normal faults, and R-prime shears are almost perpendicular to the fault. Below the diagram is a legend with symbols and angles: fold axes 45 degrees, normal faults and joints 45 degrees, R shears 15 degrees, R-prime shears 75 degrees, strain ellipse. The lower diagram shows two cross-sections. On the left, a vertical fault splays upwards near the surface into a fan of reverse faults, and the wedge between them is pushed up: a positive flower structure. On the right, a similar fan consists of normal faults and the wedge between them is lowered: a negative flower structure.

SchematicStructures of a right-lateral strike-slip fault (schematic). Above, in plan view, for a fault whose strike is along the horizontal of the drawing. The ellipse shows the directions of lengthening and shortening, and the angles of the structures follow the formulas of the lesson at μ=0.6\mu = 0.6. Below, in cross-section: a positive flower structure at a restraining bend and a negative one at a releasing bend.

Large strike-slip faults are not straight. At bends and steps where the movement pulls the sides of the fault apart (releasing bends), depressions with normal faults form, up to pull-apart basins. Where the movement pushes the sides together (restraining bends), uplifts with reverse faults and folds form (strike-slip basins). For a right-lateral fault, a step to the right extends and a step to the left compresses. For a left-lateral fault it is the other way round. If the blocks also move towards each other, the result is transpression. If they move apart, it is transtension. In cross-section, a steep strike-slip fault splits near the surface into a fan of faults that looks like a flower: a flower structure. In transpression the faults of the fan are reverse faults, and they push a wedge up. This is a positive (or palm-tree) flower structure. In transtension the faults are normal, and they drop the wedge. This is a negative flower structure.

For exploration, the strike-slip style is the most treacherous. The sign of the vertical displacement and the type of folds change along strike over short distances, from an uplift at a restraining bend to a depression at a releasing bend. The faults divide structures into blocks with different contacts, and a single seismic line shows only a random cross-section of the en echelon structures. Two kinds of evidence prove a strike-slip fault reliably: the sideways displacement of the same features in plan view (river channels, the edge of a platform, the axis of a fold), or slickenside striations (scratches left by sliding) in core. The flower pattern on a single line is only a hint, because other faults crossed at an angle give a similar picture.

Inversion: extension followed by compression

Inversion (positive inversion) is the compression of a basin that was formed by extension. The normal faults that bounded the depressions come to life as reverse faults, and the sequence that built up in the hanging walls is partly or wholly squeezed upwards. The opposite case, extension on former thrusts, is called negative inversion. What follows is about positive inversion.

Compression happens most easily on a ready-made weak surface. The hanging wall of a former normal fault, where the thickest syn-rift sequence lies, rises, and an anticline grows above the former depocentre (the place where the most sediment collected). Its core consists of syn-rift layers that thicken towards the fault. If compression was going on while the post-rift layers were being deposited, they thin towards the crest. If the old fault is too steep to slide on under compression, a new, gentler reverse fault appears in the footwall and cuts off the corner (a footwall shortcut). The step of the footwall then acts as a buttress, and the sequence is crumpled in front of it.

In inversion, the displacement from compression is subtracted from the displacement from extension. The deep horizons of the hanging wall were lowered the most, and after moderate compression they are still lowered. On them the fault remains a normal fault. The horizons deposited after the extension are displaced only by the compression, and on them the fault looks like a reverse fault. Between them lies the null point: the horizon that has returned to its former level, where the net displacement is zero. A well that crosses such a fault below the null point will pass a missing interval, and above it a repeated one (missing and repeated section).

Net throw of an inverted normal fault and the null point
tnet(y)=text(y)−trev,text(y)=hsyn−y,y0=hsyn−trevt_{net}(y) = t_{ext}(y) - t_{rev},\qquad t_{ext}(y) = h_{syn} - y,\qquad y_0 = h_{syn} - t_{rev}
where:
  • tnet(y)t_{net}(y)net vertical throw on the horizon at height yy: positive is normal, negative is reverse, m
  • text(y)t_{ext}(y)throw of this horizon accumulated during extension, m
  • trevt_{rev}reverse throw added by compression; it is measured on a horizon that had not been displaced before the compression, m
  • yyheight of the horizon above the base of the syn-rift sequence in the hanging wall next to the fault, m
  • hsynh_{syn}thickness of the syn-rift sequence in the hanging wall next to the fault, m
  • y0y_0height of the null point, m

Units: metres

Holds when
  • There are no syn-rift deposits in the footwall, and the depression in the hanging wall was filled with sediment right to the top during extension. Then the throw of a horizon equals the thickness of the syn-rift layers above it.
  • In compression the fault slides as a whole, and all horizons receive the same reverse throw.
  • If part of the compression went into new cross-cutting reverse faults or folds, the reverse throw on the old fault is less than the total shortening.

The ratio trev/hsynt_{rev}/h_{syn} is the inversion ratio. It shows what share of the syn-rift sequence lies above the null point, and what share of the extension the compression has “undone”. When the ratio equals one, the null point sinks to the base of the syn-rift sequence and the inversion is complete. With more compression, the fault becomes a reverse fault on all horizons.

Worked exampleNull point of an inverted normal fault
Given (assumed data)
Syn-rift sequence in the hanging wall next to the fault
900 m; absent in the footwall
Post-rift sequence
600 m, not displaced by the fault before the compression
Reverse throw of the top of the post-rift sequence
240 m
Assumptions
during extension the depression was filled to the top; in compression all horizons are displaced equally
Solution
  1. Before the compression, the throw on a horizon at height yy above the base of the syn-rift sequence equals the thickness of the syn-rift layers above it: text(y)=900−yt_{ext}(y) = 900 - y. At the base it is 900 m, and at the top it is 0.
  2. The compression took 240 m off the throw on all horizons: tnet(y)=900−y−240t_{net}(y) = 900 - y - 240. At the base of the syn-rift sequence, 900−240=660900 - 240 = 660 m of normal displacement remains.
  3. Null point: 900−y0=240900 - y_0 = 240, so y0=660y_0 = 660 m above the base. In the upper 240 m of the syn-rift sequence the displacement is reverse, and it grows towards the top from 0 to 240 m. In the whole post-rift sequence it is reverse, 240 m.
  4. Inversion ratio: 240/900=0.27240/900 = 0.27. The compression has “undone” about 27% of the extension.
Answer: Below a height of 660 m above the base of the syn-rift sequence, the fault remains a normal fault with a throw of up to 660 m. Above that height it is a reverse fault with a throw of up to 240 m.

What it means. A well that crosses this fault deep down will find a missing interval. A well that crosses it above the null point will find a repeated one. Having both on one fault is a typical sign of inversion. An anticline has grown above the former depocentre, and it may be a trap. The inversion is moderate: the deep part of the half-graben, with the source rocks, has stayed lowered and could have gone on generating after the compression. The risks are that the reactivated fault breaches the post-rift seal, and that erosion removes the crest. The assumption that all horizons are displaced equally simplifies the picture. If the fault dies out upwards and the reverse displacement increases with depth, the null point will lie lower than calculated. The data in this example are assumed for illustration.

Vertical throw of an inverted normal fault by horizon−20002004006008001000030060090012001500Vertical throw, m (+ normal, − reverse)Height above base of syn-rift, m← null point: 660 mbefore compressionafter inversiontop of post-rift sequencetop of syn-rift sequence

A graph. The horizontal axis is the vertical throw, from minus 300 to plus 1000 metres. The vertical axis is the height above the base of the syn-rift sequence, from 0 to 1500 metres. The solid line before the compression runs from a throw of 900 metres at the base, sloping to zero at a height of 900 metres, and then straight up along zero to 1500 metres. The dashed line after inversion is shifted to the left by 240 metres. It runs from 660 metres at the base to minus 240 at a height of 900 metres, and then straight up along minus 240. It crosses zero throw at a height of 660 metres, and the null point is marked there.

CalculatedThrow of the fault in the example on horizons at different heights above the base of the syn-rift sequence, before the compression (solid line) and after inversion (dashed). A positive throw is normal, and a negative one is reverse. The dot is the null point.

The inversion ratio matters for exploration. Weak and moderate inversion, when the null point stays inside the syn-rift sequence, is the most favourable case. The anticlines are simple and clearly visible on seismic data. They lie directly over the former depocentres, where the source rocks are, and these rocks can charge traps both during and after the compression. Strong inversion lifts the source rocks up out of the oil window and stops generation. It also complicates the migration paths, and early traps are eroded or breached by faults.

Inversion is clearly seen on Mangyshlak (folds of Mangyshlak). The northernmost of the Late Permian–Triassic rifts was compressed and strongly deformed before the Jurassic. Its axial part became the Mangyshlak fold zone. The crumpled Triassic rocks there are covered by thin Jurassic and Cretaceous deposits. On the neighbouring Zhetybai Step, the Upper Triassic rocks were eroded before the Jurassic was deposited. We date the compression from such relationships: it is younger than the Triassic rocks it crumpled and older than the Jurassic layers that came to lie on them.

Salt, gravity gliding and drape

Salt is a structural style in its own right (why salt flows, salt structures). It also affects other styles, because it makes an ideal detachment. In compression, the belt above the salt is wide, with detachment folds that die out downwards into the salt. In extension, the blocks above the salt slide and move apart, and the salt flows in between them and rises beneath the grabens. On passive margins and in deltas, sediments slide down the slope over salt or over ductile shales with abnormally high pressure. At the top of the slope, growth faults (faults that move while sediment is being deposited) with rollover anticlines stretch the sequence. At the toe, the same sliding sheet is compressed into thrusts and folds. Extension at the top and compression at the toe are parts of one gravity system, linked by a common detachment.

In the Pre-Caspian Basin the Kungurian salt divides the section into two tiers with different styles. Beneath the salt are carbonate buildups and the compressional folds of the eastern margin. Above the salt are domes, minibasins and the traps beside their walls (subsalt and suprasalt tiers). We cannot extend the structures of the suprasalt tier downwards into the subsalt tier, or the other way round. The tiers connect only where the salt has been squeezed out completely, through salt welds.

On platforms and in intracratonic basins (basins in the stable interior of a continent; intracratonic basins) the deformation is weak. Basement blocks are raised and lowered on steep faults, and the cover drapes over them in gentle folds that die out upwards. The change from a fault in the basement to a bend in the cover usually happens through a ductile layer that flows over the step. Such folds have a small amplitude, but they continue over a large area and serve as traps on many platforms.

How tectonic history is reconstructed

A structure does not carry the time of its deformation as a label. We work out the time from the relationships between structures and rock units (principles of stratigraphy).

  • Cross-cutting relationships. A fault, a vein (a crack filled with minerals) or an intrusion (a body of igneous rock that pushed into the layers) is younger than everything it cuts, and older than everything that lies on top of it without being displaced.
  • Unconformities. An angular unconformity (a surface where tilted layers are covered by flatter ones) above crumpled layers dates the folding. The folding is younger than the youngest crumpled layers and older than the oldest layers above the unconformity (unconformities).
  • Growth strata. Layers deposited while a structure was growing thicken towards the downthrown side of a normal fault and into a syncline. They thin towards the crest of a growing fold, and their dip decreases upwards in a fan. Units deposited before and after the deformation have a constant thickness.
  • Structures laid over one another. Folds that have been folded again, faults displaced by younger faults, and joints that stop against older ones (Fractures and naturally fractured reservoirs) put the events in order.
  • Numerical age. Biostratigraphy (dating by fossils) and the dating of ash beds give the ages of layers (relative and numerical age). Minerals that filled fractures and faults, and the traces of the cooling of rocks as they were uplifted and eroded, date the deformation itself.

For normal faults that grow during sedimentation (growth faults; more detail), we calculate the history from the thicknesses of growth strata. A unit deposited while the fault was moving is thicker in the hanging wall than in the footwall. The difference between its two thicknesses is the increase in vertical throw during its accumulation. The ratio of the thicknesses is called the expansion index.

Expansion index and the increase in throw of a growth fault
EI=hhwhfw,Δt=hhw−hfw,tk=∑i>kΔtiEI = \frac{h_{hw}}{h_{fw}},\qquad \Delta t = h_{hw} - h_{fw},\qquad t_k = \sum_{i > k}\Delta t_i
where:
  • EIEIexpansion index of the unit, —
  • hhw, hfwh_{hw},\ h_{fw}thickness of the unit in the hanging wall and in the footwall next to the fault, m
  • Δt\Delta tincrease in vertical throw during the accumulation of the unit, m
  • tkt_kvertical throw of the top of unit kk — the sum of the increases of all younger units, m

Units: thicknesses and throws in metres

Holds when
  • Each time, sediment filled the relief created by the fault right to the top, and the footwall was not eroded.
  • The thicknesses in both walls are reduced to one degree of compaction. In the hanging wall the unit is buried deeper and compacted more, so we restore its thickness to the original where possible (restoring thicknesses).
  • The youngest unit is not displaced by the fault. Otherwise its own throw is added to the sum.

EI=1EI = 1 means the fault did not move at that time. EI>1EI > 1 means it did, and the larger the index, the faster it moved. The index depends not only on the rate of displacement but also on the rate of sedimentation. So it is more reliable to compare the increases in throw and the rates at which they grow.

Worked exampleWhen the fault was active, and whether it was in place by the time the oil arrived
Given (assumed data)
Units from the bottom up: age (Ma = million years ago), thickness in the footwall / hanging wall
A 182–174 Ma: 140 / 140 m; B 174–163: 160 / 280 m; C 163–152: 95 / 209 m; D 152–125: 220 / 286 m; E 125–66: 300 / 300 m; F 66–40: 150 / 168 m
Oil generation (from basin modelling)
began about 95 Ma, peak 80–55 Ma
Trap
rollover anticline in the hanging wall of the fault, sealed against it
Solution
  1. Expansion indices: A — 1.00; B — 280/160=1.75280/160 = 1.75; C — 209/95=2.20209/95 = 2.20; D — 286/220=1.30286/220 = 1.30; E — 1.00; F — 168/150=1.12168/150 = 1.12.
  2. Increases in throw: B — 120 m, C — 114 m, D — 66 m, F — 18 m. During units A and E the increase is zero.
  3. The throw at the top of each unit is the sum of the increases of the younger units: the top of E — 18 m, D — 18 m, C — 84 m, B — 198 m, A — 318 m. The base of unit A was deposited before the movement began, so it is displaced by the same amount as its top.
  4. Rate of growth of the throw, in m per million years (m/Myr): B — 10.9, C — 10.4, D — 2.4, F — 0.7.
Answer: The fault grew actively from 174 to 125 Ma, fastest at the beginning, at about 11 m/Myr. During unit E it did not move, and from 66 to 40 Ma it was weakly reactivated. The rollover trap formed long before oil generation began.

What it means. In terms of timing, the trap is favourable: the closure existed when the oil began to migrate. The risk lies in the late reactivation. The fault moved again at the very height of generation and after it, and a reactivated fault may let oil pass up the section (fault zone). This is not only a risk of loss. It is also a hint to look for accumulations higher up, in unit F and above it. The estimates are too low in two cases. The first is when the hanging wall did not manage to fill with sediment: then the difference of thicknesses is less than the true increase in throw. The second is when we do not take into account the stronger compaction of the hanging-wall units. If the footwall was eroded, the difference of thicknesses overestimates the increase in throw instead. The data in this example are assumed for illustration.

Rate of growth of the fault throw and the timing of oil generation180160140120100806040024681012Time, MaThrow growth, m/MyrB, CDFgeneration onsetgeneration peak

A graph. The horizontal axis is time, from 190 to 30 million years ago, left to right. The vertical axis is the rate of growth of the throw, from 0 to 12 metres per million years. A step line shows zero until 174 million years ago, about 10.9 from 174 to 163, about 10.4 from 163 to 152, about 2.4 from 152 to 125, zero from 125 to 66, and about 0.7 from 66 to 40. Dots with dashed vertical lines mark the onset of generation, 95 million years ago, and the peak of generation, from 80 to 55 million years ago. A dashed segment joins them. The whole active phase of the fault lies to the left of the onset of generation. The weak reactivation 66–40 million years ago falls on the peak of generation and after it.

CalculatedRate of growth of the vertical throw of the fault in the example, unit by unit (step line), and the timing of oil generation: onset about 95 Ma, and peak 80–55 Ma (dots with dashed lines). Time runs from left to right.
Procedure for reconstructing the history of an area
  1. 1
    Style

    Find the deformation regime from the type of displacements and the combination of structures, and look for well-studied analogues.

  2. 2
    Sequence

    Put the events in order, using cross-cutting relationships, unconformities and structures laid over one another.

  3. 3
    Time

    Date the events from the ages of the layers: growth strata, expansion indices, layers above unconformities.

  4. 4
    Comparison

    Compare the time of growth of the structures with the time of oil generation and migration (petroleum system events).

  5. 5
    Risks

    Note the late events that could have changed or breached the trap, and carry them into the assessment of the prospect (Geological risk and chance of success).

Time of the structure and time of charge

A trap will fill only if it existed when hydrocarbons were passing through it, and if it survived afterwards (timing of trap formation). Structural analysis supplies three dates for this check: when the closure arose; when its shape changed (by tilting, growth or erosion); and when the faults that bound the trap last moved.

  • A trap older than generation is favourable. We still have to check that late tilting or the growth of neighbouring structures has not changed its shape, and that the spill point has not moved.
  • A trap younger than the main generation can fill in two cases. In the first, the oil had been held somewhere before, in earlier accumulations or in the source rocks themselves, and late deformation opened a path for it. In the second, generation was still going on in the deepest parts of the basin.
  • The faults of the trap were reactivated after charge. They could have become leakage channels, or they could have filled traps higher in the section.

South Mangyshlak illustrates the second case. According to published data, oil generation there probably began while thick Cretaceous sequences were accumulating, and it continued until the Early Miocene. Uplift and erosion before the Middle Miocene almost stopped it. Meanwhile about 70% of the growth of the anticlines of the Zhetybai Step took place from the Middle Miocene to the present day. According to the interpretation, the accumulations formed mainly in this late stage. Migration into the traps came later than generation, and it could have begun when faults and fractures cut through the mature, overpressured source rocks and the layers above them. A late trap is not necessarily empty, but we must justify such a scenario, not assume it.

Terms and symbols

Structural style
The typical set of structures that forms under one type of deformation (also called a structural family).
Thin-skinned and thick-skinned deformation
In thin-skinned deformation, the sedimentary cover is crumpled above a detachment and the basement takes no part. In thick-skinned deformation, the basement is deformed too.
Detachment
A gently dipping slip surface along a weak layer, such as salt or shale. Faults and folds detach from it (also called a décollement).
Domino model
Extension on parallel, planar (straight) normal faults, with the rigid blocks between them rotating like a row of tipping dominoes; β=sin⁡δ0/sin⁡δ\beta = \sin\delta_0/\sin\delta.
Half-graben
A lopsided depression above the hanging wall of one main normal fault. A wedge of syn-rift deposits (laid down while the crust was stretching) fills it.
Transfer zone
A place where displacement passes from one fault to another. In rifts, the main faults may change their dip direction across it (also called an accommodation zone).
Fold-and-thrust belt
A belt of shortening at the edge of a mountain range, with folds and thrusts that usually detach from a weak layer.
Imbricate fan and duplex
An imbricate fan is a set of closely spaced thrusts that converge at depth. A duplex is a stack of thrust sheets between a floor thrust and a roof thrust.
Riedel shears
Shears at a small angle (R) and at a large angle (R′) to a strike-slip fault. R shears are synthetic (they slip in the same sense as the main fault), and R′ shears are antithetic (they slip in the opposite sense).
Flower structure
A fan of faults that spreads upwards from a steep strike-slip fault. A positive flower has reverse faults, and a negative flower has normal faults.
Transpression and transtension
Strike-slip movement in which the two sides also move towards each other (transpression), and strike-slip movement in which they also move apart (transtension).
Inversion and null point
Inversion is the compression of a basin formed by extension, which turns its normal faults into reverse faults. The null point is the horizon where the net displacement is zero.
Growth strata
Layers laid down while a structure was growing. Their thickness changes across the structure.
Expansion index EIEI
The thickness of a unit in the hanging wall of a growth fault divided by its thickness in the footwall.

Common mistakes and misconceptions

Wrong

“The basin is a rift, so all its faults are normal faults.”

In fact

Later compression may have reactivated them as reverse faults, and strike-slip movement may have added a strike-slip component. We decide the type of a fault from how the horizons are displaced, not from the type of the basin.

Wrong

“The beds in the blocks were tilted from the start, and the extension equals the sum of the horizontal displacements on the visible faults.”

In fact

The blocks rotate together with the faults, and the extension depends on the rotation: β=sin⁡δ0/sin⁡δ\beta = \sin\delta_0/\sin\delta. Also, the extension summed over the visible faults is usually less than the total, because some of the faults have not been recognised.

Wrong

“En echelon folds along a fault are a sign of compression across it.”

In fact

Such folds also grow in pure strike-slip movement. They lie at an angle to the fault, across the direction of shortening in a zone of simple shear. If the compression were across the fault, the folds would be parallel to it.

Wrong

“If the fault is normal on the deep horizons, it is normal higher up too.”

In fact

Above the null point, the displacement on an inverted normal fault is reverse. So wells on the same fault can cross both a missing interval and a repeated one.

Wrong

“A trap that grew after oil generation is empty.”

In fact

Not necessarily. The oil may come from earlier accumulations, or from the source rocks when faults are reactivated, as, according to the interpretation, in South Mangyshlak. But we must justify this scenario. A trap that formed early and was then opened by late faults is a frequent cause of failure.

In depth: advanced detail

Where the domino formula comes from and when it does not work

Let the neighbouring faults be parallel, and let the distance between them, measured at right angles to their planes, be dd. A horizontal line crosses two such faults, dipping at angle δ\delta, at two points that are L=d/sin⁡δL = d/\sin\delta apart. Rigid blocks do not change shape when they rotate, so dd stays the same while the dip of the faults decreases from δ0\delta_0 to δ\delta. The ratio of the present horizontal distance to the original one is the stretching factor: β=L/L0=sin⁡δ0/sin⁡δ\beta = L/L_0 = \sin\delta_0/\sin\delta. The beds in a block rotate through the same angle as the faults, so their tilt is δb=δ0−δ\delta_b = \delta_0 - \delta.

The rotation of rigid blocks leaves gaps. At the top, above the lowered edge of each block, syn-rift sediments fill them. At the bottom, at the base of the blocks, there can be no voids. There the rocks must flow and the blocks must deform. So real blocks are often deformed inside. The other extreme model is vertical shear spread through the hanging wall. In it the initial dip is related to the present one by tan δ0=tan δ+tan δb\mathrm{tan}\,\delta_0 = \mathrm{tan}\,\delta + \mathrm{tan}\,\delta_b, and in the example of this lesson the initial dip comes out at about 51° instead of 60°. The tilt of the beds inside a block helps us tell the two models apart. With rigid rotation, the tilt is constant. With distributed shear, it grows towards the fault.

Why the structures of a strike-slip zone lie at these angles

In a zone of simple shear, the directions of greatest lengthening and shortening at any one moment (the instantaneous strain) lie at 45° to the zone (strain). Assume that the greatest compression σ1\sigma_1 coincides with the direction of shortening. Then, by the Coulomb criterion, new shears form at an angle of 45°−φ/245° - \varphi/2 to σ1\sigma_1, on both sides of it (Anderson angles). One of them lies at an angle φ/2\varphi/2 to the zone. These are the synthetic R shears. The other lies at 90°−φ/290° - \varphi/2 to the zone. These are the antithetic R′ shears. Folds and thrusts grow across the shortening, that is, at 45° to the zone on the other side. Joints and normal faults grow along σ1\sigma_1.

As the displacement grows, the picture changes. The long axis of the finite strain ellipse (the ellipse into which all the deformation turns a circle) rotates towards the strike of the zone, and the early folds rotate with it. So in mature strike-slip zones, the en echelon folds lie at an angle much less than 45°. The R shears grow and merge. P shears join them; these are the mirror images of the R shears about the zone. In this way a chain of short shears turns into one through-going strike-slip fault. In transpression, compression across the zone is added to the simple shear, and the folds grow closer to the strike of the zone from the start. In transtension, the normal faults lie closer to the strike.

Connections to other topics

Check yourself

  1. 1

    A right-lateral strike-slip fault strikes north–south (0–180°). How are the axes of the en echelon folds that formed above it at the start of the deformation oriented?

    1. A.Along the line 135–315° (north-west to south-east)
    2. B.Perpendicular to the strike-slip fault, 90–270°
    3. C.Along the line 45–225° (north-east to south-west)
    4. D.Parallel to the strike-slip fault, 0–180°
    Show the answer

    Correct answer: A. Along the line 135–315° (north-west to south-east)

    For a right-lateral fault, the folds are turned anticlockwise by 45° from the strike of the fault: 0°−45°=−45°0° - 45° = -45°, which is the line 135–315°. Normal faults and joints are turned clockwise and strike along 45–225°. As the displacement grows, the folds rotate and come closer to the strike of the strike-slip fault.

  2. 2

    Normal faults in tilted blocks now dip at 35°, and the beds in the blocks are tilted by 25° in the opposite direction. What was the initial dip of the faults, and by what factor has the sequence been stretched, if the blocks rotated as rigid bodies?

    Show the answer

    The initial dip is 35°+25°=60°35° + 25° = 60°. That is the dip of new normal faults when the coefficient of friction is about 0.6, so the model is plausible. The stretching is β=sin⁡60°/sin⁡35°=0.866/0.574≈1.51\beta = \sin 60°/\sin 35° = 0.866/0.574 \approx 1.51: the section has lengthened by about one and a half times.

  3. 3

    In the hanging wall of a normal fault, a unit is 330 m thick. In the footwall it is 220 m thick. The unit above it has the same thickness on both sides, and the fault does not displace it. What can we say about the fault?

    Show the answer

    The expansion index of the lower unit is 330/220=1.5330/220 = 1.5. So the fault moved while this unit was accumulating, and its throw grew by 110 m. The unit above has the same thickness on both sides and is not displaced, so the fault had stopped by the time that unit began to be deposited. Hence the top of the lower unit is not displaced, and its base is displaced by 110 m. Older horizons are displaced by 110 m plus the increases that built up while the layers between them and this base were deposited, if the fault was moving then too.

  4. 4

    Which observation is the most reliable indication of positive inversion of a normal fault?

    1. A.All the units in the hanging wall thicken towards the fault
    2. B.The deep horizons are displaced on the fault as by a normal fault, and the younger ones as by a reverse fault
    3. C.The beds in the blocks are tilted in the direction opposite to the dip of the faults
    4. D.The fault dies out upwards in the post-rift sequence
    Show the answer

    Correct answer: B. The deep horizons are displaced on the fault as by a normal fault, and the younger ones as by a reverse fault

    The sign of the displacement changes with height, with a null point between the deep and the shallow horizons. This follows directly from the compression having subtracted its displacement from the displacement made by the extension. Thickening of units towards the fault points to a growth fault. Dying out upwards shows only that the fault stopped moving. A tilt of the beds against the dip of the faults points to the rotation of domino blocks.

  5. 5

    The source rocks released most of their oil 80–50 Ma. An anticline above a former half-graben grew during inversion, 30–10 Ma. Can it be filled, and what must we check?

    Show the answer

    The trap is younger than the main generation, so it can be filled only if oil arrived later. The oil could have come from earlier accumulations that the inversion tilted or breached; from source rocks that were still in the oil window in the deep part of the half-graben; or from overpressured rocks that reactivated faults opened up. We check the burial and heating history of the source rocks after 50 Ma, whether there are earlier traps nearby, and the migration paths along faults. Such late filling is possible: according to the interpretation, this is how the accumulations of South Mangyshlak formed. But we must justify it.

  6. 6

    Why are traps along a strike-slip zone usually harder to predict than in a fold-and-thrust belt?

    1. A.The sign of the vertical displacement and the type of structures change quickly along strike: releasing and restraining bends, en echelon structures and blocks alternate over short distances
    2. B.Strike-slip faults do not create traps
    3. C.Strike-slip faults occur only at plate boundaries
    4. D.The faults of strike-slip zones are not visible on seismic data
    Show the answer

    Correct answer: A. The sign of the vertical displacement and the type of structures change quickly along strike: releasing and restraining bends, en echelon structures and blocks alternate over short distances

    Strike-slip zones create anticlines, depressions and blocks alike, but where each one lies depends on the bends and steps of the fault and on where the structures had time to form. In fold-and-thrust belts, folds and thrusts stay the same along strike for tens of kilometres. Along a strike-slip fault, the structure changes within a few kilometres, and a single line shows only a random cross-section of the en echelon structures.

Updated: 26 October 2026